No Controls, No Science

As a quick follow up to my last article, I wanted to emphasize the importance of what's really missing here in the deception of virology.

First of all, I owe a lot of credit to Dr. Tom Cowan for helping me to understand the underlying contradictions in the scientific data versus the statements made about virology. As mentioned in my previous article, much of this work ties back to virologist, Dr. Stefan Lanka and all that he’s been revealing for us over the past 25-30 years as he’s been questioning the underlying paradigm of virology.

As many are aware, there is a great schism in the so-called “Health Freedom Community”. The name sounds fine (as do so many names for groups), but I am hesitant to join and profess my faith to any group as I’ve long observed that all genuine movements appear to become co-opted in time, or the seemingly genuine origins of many groups are anything but. But I digress…

Dr. Peter McCullough is one (along with other big names in the Health Freedom Movement such as Dr. Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, and Robert Kennedy) who has been adamantly opposed to exploring the questions (note: I’m not referring to beliefs, statements, or ideas, per se, but simply valid questions - what science is supposed to be about) put forth by Dr. Cowan, Dr. Kaufmann, Drs. Sam & Mark Bailey, and Dr. Stefan Lanka, amongst others regarding the underpinnings of virology, often on the grounds that this endeavor only serves to pull down on the movement and slow the momentum they’re gaining in other areas. I believe this view could not be more misguided and aloof.

Here is Dr. Cowan’s reply to McCullough. He looks closely at the study McCullough has recently referred to as the “definitive proof that SARS CoV-2 exists”. Cowan points out that the methodology is flawed, and as usual, no controls were used - thus, no science was performed.

Also, around the 38 minute mark, Cowan explores a variety of EM photos which appear to be SARS CoV-2 but are instead from lung or kidney biopsies, all prior to 2020 demonstrating, once again, that what is being called a virus is a product of cellular breakdown, or the loss of cellular integrity - essentially, the only game in town when it comes to disease state, compromised cellular integrity.

“If you were a scientist, why wouldn’t you want to do every possible control. If one stonewalls, then that should arouse suspicion.” - Dr. Cowan

Proton Magic Substack has pointed out how McCullough is still receiving large payouts from the pharma industry, so there may lie the conflict of interest in willingness to view and speak on the truth.

What it essentially boils down to is that none of these so-called scientific experiments which are continually referenced as proof of the existence of a virus (any virus, really) provide sufficient controls (dependent vs. independent variables).

Thus, (just as in our legal system, by the way) the premise is a matter of presumption or assumption that there is any virus in the first place since the experiment provides no proof in and of itself (ie. no adequate control).

One could also say that a virus has never stood alone on its own in any visible way, and that all images of so-called viruses are an artifact of the process of “cell culturing” (it’s not quite what the words imply) which is a toxic soup of antibiotics, monkey kidney cells, fetal calf serum, and other chemicals. So how could a virus be seen as “isolated” when it emerges from within that soup and is always part of that soup?

Dr Stefan Lanka showed through his controlled experiments that the same particles formed even when a control specimen from an “uninfected person” (ie. sputum from person with no symptoms), or no sputum, was added to this process, all of which produced the noted cytopathogenic effect (CPE).
The crux of the entire phenomenon of the 20th century known as virology.

This all gave rise to Mike Stone’s website viroLIEgy

This film (The Viral Delusion) also brings it together

I don’t want to get too wordy here. And I am well aware of how many “smart people” are denouncing the “viral deniers”. I simply encourage people to think for themselves, trust their heart, and objectively and honestly view the available information to the best of their ability.

I do believe that this is a fundamental turning point for us as a nation. Once a critical mass of people come to perceive the latent deception of virology, then I believe a tremendous change is possible. For some, this may be the beginning of a major cascade of awakenings unto the deception to which we have been enwrapped for decades, generations, perhaps centuries.